Many African infrastructure projects earn revenue in local currency but rely on financing denominated in dollars or euros. That mismatch can weaken otherwise viable projects and make long-term financing more difficult.
Infrastructure projects are long-term investments.
Roads, energy systems, utilities, digital infrastructure and transport assets may operate for decades, often generating revenues almost entirely in the currencies of the markets they serve.
The financing used to build them, however, is frequently denominated in foreign currency.
That creates a fundamental structural challenge:
local-currency revenues supporting hard-currency obligations.
When exchange rates move significantly, a project can face higher debt-service requirements even when its underlying operations remain relatively stable.
Reducing that mismatch is therefore one of the practical challenges facing infrastructure finance across African markets. Aderra_Website_Copy_Script
The currency mismatch
Consider the basic structure of an infrastructure project.
Its customers may pay tariffs, fees or other charges in local currency.
Operating expenses may also be largely local.
But if the project has borrowed in dollars or euros, its financing obligations move with the exchange rate.
This creates an imbalance between the currency in which the project earns money and the currency in which it must repay capital.
The problem becomes particularly important for projects with long financing tenors.
Infrastructure assets need financing structures that can remain sustainable through economic cycles, rather than structures that only appear viable at financial close.
A project may have strong underlying economics and still experience financing pressure if currency movements materially increase the local-currency cost of servicing foreign-currency debt.
Local capital can reduce structural risk
One response is to finance more infrastructure using capital denominated in the same currency as the project’s revenues.
That brings attention to domestic institutional investors.
Pension funds, insurers and other local institutions often manage long-term liabilities. In principle, that makes them potentially well suited to investments with similarly long-term characteristics, including infrastructure. Aderra_Website_Copy_Script
Greater participation from local institutional capital can help reduce reliance on foreign-currency financing.
It can also create financing structures that are more closely aligned with the economic environment in which the underlying asset operates.
But the availability of local capital does not automatically mean it can be deployed into infrastructure.
The challenge is creating structures that institutions can actually invest in.
The instrument has to fit the investor
Institutional investors operate within defined investment mandates, regulations and risk parameters.
Infrastructure opportunities therefore need to be presented through instruments and structures that are appropriate for those investors.
The objective is not simply to say:
“There is local capital available.”
The more important question is:
“Can that capital access infrastructure through a structure that meets the investor’s requirements?”
This is where financing design becomes critical.
Projects need credible cash flows, appropriate risk allocation, sufficient documentation and structures that allow institutional investors to evaluate the opportunity within their own investment frameworks.
The original EnfraCo perspective identifies suitable instruments, credible structures and an enabling regulatory environment as important conditions for mobilising more domestic capital. Aderra_Website_Copy_Script
Regulation matters
Local institutional capital is often governed by rules designed to protect beneficiaries and maintain financial stability.
That is necessary.
But it also means that infrastructure investment cannot be approached purely as a project-development question.
It is also a market-structure question.
For domestic capital to participate more meaningfully, the regulatory environment has to support appropriate forms of long-term investment while maintaining suitable risk controls.
This is why deeper infrastructure financing markets require coordination between:
- Project sponsors
- Investors
- Financial institutions
- Regulators
- Advisors
- Other market participants
Infrastructure finance is ultimately shaped by both the quality of individual projects and the market environment surrounding them.
There is no single solution
Local-currency financing is important, but it is not the only mechanism available.
Different projects will require different combinations of solutions.
The original EnfraCo framework points to several potential approaches:
Local-currency financing
Matching financing obligations more closely with project revenues.
Partial guarantees
Addressing specific risks that may otherwise prevent investors or lenders from participating.
Hedging
Managing certain currency exposures where suitable hedging instruments are available.
Blended structures
Combining different forms of capital to distribute risk more effectively across participants. Aderra_Website_Copy_Script
The challenge lies in determining which combination is appropriate for a particular transaction.
Financing structures need to survive the cycle
A financing structure should not only work under favourable conditions.
It should be capable of absorbing reasonable levels of stress.
That means project sponsors and capital providers need to consider how the transaction performs when assumptions change.
The key question is whether the project can continue carrying its financing through different market conditions — rather than only at the moment the financing is signed.
This requires careful consideration of revenue, currency exposure, financing costs, debt-service requirements and the distribution of risk between the parties involved.
The objective is a structure where risk is shared sensibly and the financing remains aligned with the underlying economics of the project. Aderra_Website_Copy_Script
The domestic capital opportunity
Mobilising more local capital could help address one of the structural challenges facing African infrastructure finance.
But success depends on more than the size of domestic savings pools.
Capital needs a pathway into investable projects.
That requires:
Credible projects
Opportunities with clear economics and financing requirements.
Suitable instruments
Structures through which institutional investors can participate.
Appropriate risk allocation
Clear understanding of who bears construction, operating, currency and other risks.
Supportive market conditions
Regulatory and institutional frameworks that enable long-term capital deployment.
Strong transaction preparation
Financial analysis and documentation capable of supporting institutional investment decisions.
These elements need to develop together.
Better alignment between capital and projects
The deeper objective is not simply to replace foreign capital with local capital.
International capital will continue to play an important role in financing African infrastructure.
The goal is to create a broader and more resilient financing ecosystem.
That means combining local and international capital in ways that better reflect project economics and manage the risks created by currency mismatches.
Where appropriate, local-currency capital can become an important part of that financing mix.
Building the market
The infrastructure financing gap cannot be addressed through a single instrument, investor group or policy intervention.
It requires deeper markets capable of connecting long-term capital with credible investment opportunities.
That means developing projects that are ready for institutional investment while also strengthening the structures through which capital can reach them.
The opportunity is therefore both transactional and systemic.
Better-prepared projects create better opportunities for investors.
More effective capital-market structures create better financing options for projects.
And over time, these reinforce each other.
EnfraCo Perspective
At EnfraCo Capital Partners, we view local-currency financing and domestic institutional capital as part of a wider effort to strengthen how capital reaches productive investment across Africa.
The objective is not simply to mobilise more capital.
It is to build financing structures that are appropriate for the underlying project, allocate risk sensibly and remain sustainable through changing market conditions. Aderra_Website_Copy_Script
Research → Dialogue → Better Markets → Better Capital Formation
Explore Financial Markets Development →
